We are excited to announce that the repository will soon undergo an upgrade, featuring a new look and feel along with several enhanced features to improve your experience. Please be on the lookout for further updates and announcements regarding the launch date. We appreciate your support and look forward to unveiling the improved platform soon.
dc.contributor.author | Nsibande, Rejoice N.![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Modiba, Maropeng M.![]() |
|
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-17T07:32:08Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-01-17T07:32:08Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
dc.description.abstract | The paper reports on a study that explored selected lecturers’ perspectives and discourses on a university’s Student Evaluation of Teaching (SET) policy in South Africa; particularly what the policy prioritised in terms of purpose and evaluation processes. It also reports on the lecturers’ reflections on the additional questions they included in the self-designed evaluation tools. A questionnaire, informal group conversations, and extended observations were used to collect data, and Latour (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford University Press and Latour (2013). An Inquiry Into Modes of Existence. Translated by C. Porter. London: Harvard University Press works helped make sense of the lecturers’ perspectives and discourses. Findings indicate a partial grasp of what the SET policy promotes. Lecturers’ understanding seemed to emphasise teaching evaluations’ professional development and accountability functions. Little attention was paid to the context in which teaching and learning occurred. The conclusion suggests ways in which the guidance given to lecturers could be improved to help them understand and work more effectively with their university’s SET policy. | en_US |
dc.description.department | Education Innovation | en_US |
dc.description.sdg | SDG-04:Quality Education | en_US |
dc.description.sdg | SDG-16:Peace,justice and strong institutions | en_US |
dc.description.uri | https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/REAE | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Rejoice Nsibande & Maropeng Modiba (2024) Perspectives and discourses on teaching evaluations in a South African university, Ethnography and Education, 19:3, 225-242, DOI: 10.1080/17457823.2024.2354208. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1745-7823 (print) | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1745-7831 (online) | |
dc.identifier.other | 10.1080/17457823.2024.2354208 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2263/100126 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Routledge | en_US |
dc.rights | © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis GroupThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). | en_US |
dc.subject | Student evaluation of teaching (SET) | en_US |
dc.subject | Lecturers | en_US |
dc.subject | Perspectives and discourses | en_US |
dc.subject | SDG-04: Quality education | en_US |
dc.subject | SDG-16: Peace, justice and strong institutions | en_US |
dc.title | Perspectives and discourses on teaching evaluations in a South African university | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |