dc.contributor.author |
Richter, Loandi
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Duvenage, Stacey
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Du Plessis, Erika Margarete
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Msimango, Thabang
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Dlangalala, Manana
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Mathavha, Muneiwa Tshidino
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Molelekoa, Tintswalo
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Kgoale, Degracious M.
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2025-01-17T05:26:07Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2025-01-17T05:26:07Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2024-08 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Escherichia coli, both commensal and pathogenic,
can colonize plants and persist in various environments. It indicates
fecal contamination in water and food and serves as a marker of
antimicrobial resistance. In this context, 61 extended-spectrum βlactamase (ESBL)-producing E. coli from irrigation water and fresh
produce from previous studies were characterized using whole
genome sequencing (Illumina MiSeq). The Center for Genomic
Epidemiology and Galaxy platforms were used to determine
antimicrobial resistance genes, virulence genes, plasmid typing,
mobile genetic elements, multilocus sequence typing (MLST), and
pathogenicity prediction. In total, 19 known MLST groups were
detected among the 61 isolates. Phylogroup B1 (ST58) and
Phylogroup E (ST9583) were the most common sequence types.
The six ST10 (serotype O101:H9) isolates carried the most resistance genes, spanning eight antibiotic classes. Overall, 95.1% of the
isolates carried resistance genes from three or more classes. The blaCTX‑M‑1, blaCTX‑M‑14, and blaCTX‑M‑15 ESBL genes were associated
with mobile genetic elements, and all of the E. coli isolates showed a >90% predicted probability of being a human pathogen. This
study provided novel genomic information on environmental multidrug-resistant ESBL-producing E. coli from fresh produce and
irrigation water, highlighting the environment as a reservoir for multidrug-resistant strains and emphasizing the need for ongoing
pathogen surveillance within a One Health context. |
en_US |
dc.description.department |
Plant and Soil Sciences |
en_US |
dc.description.sdg |
SDG-03:Good heatlh and well-being |
en_US |
dc.description.sdg |
SDG-06:Clean water and sanitation |
en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship |
The Water Research Commission
(WRC), the Partnerships for Enhanced
Engagement in Research (PEER), the Department of
Science and Innovation (DSI), the National Research Foundation (NRF), y the UK Department of Health and
Social Care. |
en_US |
dc.description.uri |
http://scialert.net/jindex.php?issn=1994-7887 |
en_US |
dc.description.uri |
https://pubs.acs.org/journal/esthag |
en_US |
dc.identifier.citation |
Richter, L., Duvenage, S., Du Plessis, E.M. et al. 2024, 'Genomic evaluation of multidrug-resistant extended-spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli from irrigation water and fresh produce in South Africa : a cross-sectional analysis', Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 58, no. 32, pp. 14059-14594, doi: 10.1021/acs.est.4c02431. |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
1994-7887 (print) |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
2077-2181 (online) |
|
dc.identifier.other |
10.1021/acs.est.4c02431 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/100118 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
American Chemical Society |
en_US |
dc.rights |
© The Author(s) 2024. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
en_US |
dc.subject |
One health |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Food safety |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Environmental surveillance |
en_US |
dc.subject |
ExPEC |
en_US |
dc.subject |
SDG-03: Good health and well-being |
en_US |
dc.subject |
SDG-06: Clean water and sanitation |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Whole genome sequencing (WGS) |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Escherichia coli |
en_US |
dc.title |
Genomic evaluation of multidrug-resistant extended-spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli from irrigation water and fresh produce in South Africa : a cross-sectional analysis |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |