Theoretical risk of genetic reassortment should not impede development of live, attenuated Rift Valley fever (RVF) vaccines commentary on the draft WHO RVF Target Product Profile

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Monath, Thomas P.
dc.contributor.author Kortekaas, Jeroen
dc.contributor.author Watts, Douglas M.
dc.contributor.author Christofferson, Rebecca C.
dc.contributor.author LaBeaud, Angelle Desiree
dc.contributor.author Gowen, Brian
dc.contributor.author Peters, Clarence J.
dc.contributor.author Smith, Darci R.
dc.contributor.author Swanepoel, Robert
dc.contributor.author Morrill, John C.
dc.contributor.author Ksiazek, Thomas G.
dc.contributor.author Pittman, Phillip R
dc.contributor.author Bird, Brian H.
dc.contributor.author Bettinger, George
dc.date.accessioned 2021-08-23T14:53:08Z
dc.date.available 2021-08-23T14:53:08Z
dc.date.issued 2020-08
dc.description.abstract In November 2019, The World Health Organization (WHO) issued a draft set of Target Product Profiles (TPPs) describing optimal and minimally acceptable targets for vaccines against Rift Valley fever (RVF), a Phlebovirus with a three segmented genome, in both humans and ruminants. The TPPs contained rigid requirements to protect against genomic reassortment of live, attenuated vaccines (LAVs) with wild-type RVF virus (RVFV), which place undue constraints on development and regulatory approval of LAVs. We review the current LAVs in use and in development, and conclude that there is no evidence that reassortment between LAVs and wild-type RVFV has occurred during field use, that such a reassortment event if it occurred would have no untoward consequence, and that the TPPs should be revised to provide a more balanced assessment of the benefits versus the theoretical risks of reassortment. en_ZA
dc.description.department Veterinary Tropical Diseases en_ZA
dc.description.librarian hj2021 en_ZA
dc.description.uri http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jvacx en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Monath, T.P., Kortekaas, J., Watts, D.M. et al. 2020. 'Theoretical Risk of Genetic Reassortment Should Not Impede Development of Live, Attenuated Rift Valley Fever (rvf) Vaccines Commentary on the Draft Who RVF Target Product Profile', Vaccine: X, vol. 5, art. 100060, pp. 1-9, doi: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2020.100060. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 2590-1362
dc.identifier.other 10.1016/j.jvacx.2020.100060
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/81440
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher Elsevier en_ZA
dc.rights © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license. en_ZA
dc.subject Genetic reassortment en_ZA
dc.subject Rift Valley fever (RVF) en_ZA
dc.subject Target product profile (TPP) en_ZA
dc.subject Live, attenuated vaccines (LAVs) en_ZA
dc.subject Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV) en_ZA
dc.title Theoretical risk of genetic reassortment should not impede development of live, attenuated Rift Valley fever (RVF) vaccines commentary on the draft WHO RVF Target Product Profile en_ZA
dc.type Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record