Sustaining control : lessons from the Lubombo spatial development initiative in southern Africa

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Maharaj, Rajendra
dc.contributor.author Moonasar, Devanand
dc.contributor.author Baltazar, Candrinho
dc.contributor.author Kunene, Simon
dc.contributor.author Morris, Natashia
dc.date.accessioned 2016-10-18T11:04:54Z
dc.date.available 2016-10-18T11:04:54Z
dc.date.issued 2016-08-12
dc.description Data used in this study are available from the Ministries of Health in South Africa, Swaziland and Mozambique. en_ZA
dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND : The Lubombo Spatial Development Initiative (LSDI) was a tri-country project between South Africa, Swaziland and Mozambique with the aim of accelerating socio-economic development in the region. The malaria component of the project was introduced to decrease the transmission of malaria in the region. This goal was met but with termination of this project resulted in an upsurge of malaria cases in the sub-region mainly as a result of migration from high transmission areas to low transmission ones. The movement of people across borders in southern Africa remains a challenge in sustaining malaria control and elimination. METHODS : Malaria case data for Swaziland and South Africa were obtained from their respective national Malaria Information Systems. Data for Mozambique was obtained from the Mozambican Ministry of Health. Data obtained during the course of the LSDI project was compared to the case data post the termination of the LSDI. RESULTS : The 12-year period of the LSDI showed a substantial decrease in disease burden amongst the three countries involved when compared to the baseline year of 2000. The decrease in malaria cases was 99 % in South Africa and 98 % in Swaziland. Malaria prevalence in Mozambique decreased by 85 % over the same period. However, after the LSDI ended, between 2012 and 2014, there was an upward trend in case data that was counter to the goal of elimination. CONCLUSION : South Africa and Swaziland benefitted from the LSDI and were able to sustain malaria control and progress to the stage of elimination. Mozambique could not sustain the gains made during the LSDI and case numbers increased. Technical and financial resources are key challenges for malaria control and elimination interventions. en_ZA
dc.description.department School of Health Systems and Public Health (SHSPH) en_ZA
dc.description.librarian am2016 en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorship No direct funding was received for this study however the original LSDI study was made possible by funds received from the Global Fund to fight AIDS, TB and Malaria en_ZA
dc.description.uri http://www.malariajournal.com en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Maharaj, R, Moonasar, D, Baltazar, C, Kunene, S & Morris, N 2016, 'Sustaining contro l: lessons from the Lubombo spatial development initiative in southern Africa', Malaria Journal, vol. 15, art. #409, pp. 1-9. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 1475-2875
dc.identifier.other 10.1186/s12936-016-1453-9
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/57349
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher BioMed Central en_ZA
dc.rights © 2016 The Author(s). This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. en_ZA
dc.subject Cross-border malaria en_ZA
dc.subject Sustainability en_ZA
dc.subject Elimination en_ZA
dc.subject Lubombo spatial development initiative (LSDI) en_ZA
dc.title Sustaining control : lessons from the Lubombo spatial development initiative in southern Africa en_ZA
dc.type Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record