dc.contributor.author |
Cassim, Maleka Femida
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2016-05-06T14:08:29Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2016-05-06T14:08:29Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2009 |
|
dc.description |
This article was written by Maleka Femida Cassim before she joined the University of Pretoria. |
en_ZA |
dc.description.abstract |
It is a well-entrenched principle of corporate law that a director has a
fiduciary duty not to make a secret profit out of his trust, and generally must
not place himself in a position in which his duty and self-interest may conflict
(Aberdeen Railway Co v Blaikie Bros (1854) 2 Eq Rep 12 461; Regal (Hastings)
Ltd v Gulliver [1967] 2 AC 134 (HL); Robinson v Randfontein Gold Mining Co
Ltd 1921AD 168; Phillips v Fieldstone Africa (Pty) Ltd 2004 (3) SA 465 (SCA);
Bhullar v Bhullar [2003] 2 BCLC 241 (CA);MS Blackman, R D Jooste, G K
Everingham, M Larkin, C H Rademeyer & J L Yeats Commentary on the
Companies Act Volume 2 (2008) 8-30). This broader principle may be
subdivided into two categories, namely the corporate opportunity rule and
the no-profit rule. |
en_ZA |
dc.description.department |
Mercantile Law |
en_ZA |
dc.description.librarian |
am2016 |
en_ZA |
dc.description.uri |
http://reference.sabinet.co.za/sa_epublication/ju_salj |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.citation |
Cassim, MF 2009, 'Da Silva v C H Chemicals (Pty) Ltd : fiduciary duties of resigning directors', South African Law Journal, vol. 126, no. pp. 61-70. |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.issn |
0258-2503 (print) |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
1996-2177 (online) |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/52516 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_ZA |
dc.publisher |
Juta Law |
en_ZA |
dc.rights |
Juta Law |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Director |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Principle |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Profit |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Corporate law |
en_ZA |
dc.title |
Da Silva v C H Chemicals (Pty) Ltd : fiduciary duties of resigning directors |
en_ZA |
dc.type |
Article |
en_ZA |