Misconduct in research : a descriptive survey of attitudes, perceptions and associated factors in a developing country

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Okonta, Patrick
dc.contributor.author Rossouw, Theresa M.
dc.date.accessioned 2015-05-26T06:45:51Z
dc.date.available 2015-05-26T06:45:51Z
dc.date.issued 2014-03-25
dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND : Misconduct in research tarnishes the reputation, credibility and integrity of research institutions. Studies on research or scientific misconduct are still novel in developing countries. In this study, we report on the attitudes, perceptions and factors related to the work environment thought to be associated with research misconduct in a group of researchers in Nigeria - a developing country. METHOD : A survey of researchers attending a scientific conference was done using an adapted Scientific Misconduct Questionnaire-Revised (SMQ-R). Initial descriptive analysis of individual items using frequencies and proportions for all quantitative data was performed. Thereafter, Likert scale responses were transformed into dichotomous responses. Fisher exact test was performed for associations as appropriate. A two-tailed p-value of less than 0.05 was accepted as significant. RESULT : Half of the respondents (50.4%) were aware of a colleague who had committed misconduct, defined as “non-adherence to rules, regulations, guidelines, and commonly accepted professional codes or norms”. Over 88% of the researchers were concerned about the perceived amount of misconduct prevalent in their institution and 96.2% believed that one or more forms of scientific misconduct had occurred in their workplace. More than half (52.7%) rated the severity of penalties for scientific misconduct in their work environment as low. Furthermore¸ the majority (56.1%) were of the view that the chance of getting caught for scientific misconduct in their work environment was low. CONCLUSION : Researchers in Nigeria perceive that scientific misconduct is commonplace in their institutions, but are however worried about the negative effects of scientific misconduct on the credibility of scientific research. We recommend that researchers be empowered with the knowledge and virtues necessary for self-regulation that advance research integrity. Research institutions should however also step into their role of fostering a responsible research ethic and discouraging misconduct. en_ZA
dc.description.librarian am2015 en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorship A grant from the Fogarty International Center, National Institute of Health, Grant number 2R25TW0 1599–10 through the South African Research Ethics Training Initiative SARETI. en_ZA
dc.description.uri http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcmedethics en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Okonta, P & Rossouw, TM 2014, 'Misconduct in research : a descriptive survey of attitudes, perceptions and associated factors in a developing country', BMC Medical Ethics, vol. 15, art. no. 25, pp. 1-8. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 1472-6939
dc.identifier.other 10.1186/1472-6939-15-25
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/45267
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher BioMed Central en_ZA
dc.rights © 2014 Okonta and Rossouw; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. en_ZA
dc.subject Research misconduct en_ZA
dc.subject Perception en_ZA
dc.subject Attitudes en_ZA
dc.subject Associated factors en_ZA
dc.title Misconduct in research : a descriptive survey of attitudes, perceptions and associated factors in a developing country en_ZA
dc.type Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record