Dissociative identity disorder : an empirical overview

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Dorahy, Martin J.
dc.contributor.author Brand, Bethany L.
dc.contributor.author Şar, Vedat
dc.contributor.author Kruger, Christa
dc.contributor.author Stavropoulos, Pam
dc.contributor.author Martínez-Taboas, Alfonso
dc.contributor.author Lewis-Fernández, Roberto
dc.contributor.author Middleton, Warwick
dc.date.accessioned 2015-01-28T09:57:35Z
dc.date.available 2015-01-28T09:57:35Z
dc.date.issued 2014-05
dc.description.abstract OBJECTIVE : Despite its long and auspicious place in the history of psychiatry, dissociative identity disorder (DID) has been associated with controversy. This paper aims to examine the empirical data related to DID and outline the contextual challenges to its scientific investigation. METHODS : The overview is limited to DID-specific research in which one or more of the following conditions are met: (i) a sample of participants with DID was systematically investigated, (ii) psychometrically-sound measures were utilised, (iii) comparisons were made with other samples, (iv) DID was differentiated from other disorders, including other dissociative disorders, (v) extraneous variables were controlled or (vi) DID diagnosis was confirmed. Following an examination of challenges to research, data are organised around the validity and phenomenology of DID, its aetiology and epidemiology, the neurobiological and cognitive correlates of the disorder, and finally its treatment. RESULTS : DID was found to be a complex yet valid disorder across a range of markers. It can be accurately discriminated from other disorders, especially when structured diagnostic interviews assess identity alterations and amnesia. DID is aetiologically associated with a complex combination of developmental and cultural factors, including severe childhood relational trauma. The prevalence of DID appears highest in emergency psychiatric settings and affects approximately 1% of the general population. Psychobiological studies are beginning to identify clear correlates of DID associated with diverse brain areas and cognitive functions. They are also providing an understanding of the potential metacognitive origins of amnesia. Phase-oriented empirically-guided treatments are emerging for DID. CONCLUSIONS : The empirical literature on DID is accumulating, although some areas remain under-investigated. Existing data show DID as a complex, valid and not uncommon disorder, associated with developmental and cultural variables, that is amenable to psychotherapeutic intervention. en_ZA
dc.description.librarian hb2015 en_ZA
dc.description.uri http://anp.sagepub.com en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Dorahy MJ, Brand BL, Şar V, Krüger C, Stavropoulos P, Martínez-Taboas A, Lewis-Fernández R & Middleton W 2014, 'Dissociative identity disorder : an empirical overview', Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 402-417. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 0004-8674 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 1440-1614 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.1177/0004867414527523
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/43470
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher Sage en_ZA
dc.rights © The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists 2014 en_ZA
dc.subject Validity en_ZA
dc.subject Phenomenology en_ZA
dc.subject Aetiology en_ZA
dc.subject Psychobiology en_ZA
dc.subject Treatment en_ZA
dc.subject Dissociative identity disorder (DID) en_ZA
dc.title Dissociative identity disorder : an empirical overview en_ZA
dc.type Postprint Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record