Underperformance of African protected area networks and the case for new conservation models : insights from Zambia

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Lindsey, Peter Andrew
dc.contributor.author Nyirenda, Vincent R.
dc.contributor.author Barnes, Jonathan I.
dc.contributor.author Becker, Matthew S.
dc.contributor.author McRobb, Rachel
dc.contributor.author Tambling, Craig J.
dc.contributor.author Taylor, William Andrew
dc.contributor.author Watson, Frederick G.
dc.contributor.author t'Sas-Rolfes, Michael
dc.contributor.editor Russo, Danilo
dc.date.accessioned 2014-08-15T11:48:17Z
dc.date.available 2014-08-15T11:48:17Z
dc.date.issued 2014-05-21
dc.description.abstract Many African protected areas (PAs) are not functioning effectively. We reviewed the performance of Zambia’s PA network and provide insights into how their effectiveness might be improved. Zambia’s PAs are under-performing in ecological, economic and social terms. Reasons include: a) rapidly expanding human populations, poverty and open-access systems in Game Management Areas (GMAs) resulting in widespread bushmeat poaching and habitat encroachment; b) underfunding of the Zambia Wildlife Authority (ZAWA) resulting in inadequate law enforcement; c) reliance of ZAWA on extracting revenues from GMAs to cover operational costs which has prevented proper devolution of user-rights over wildlife to communities; d) on-going marginalization of communities from legal benefits from wildlife; e) under-development of the photo-tourism industry with the effect that earnings are limited to a fraction of the PA network; f) unfavourable terms and corruption which discourage good practice and adequate investment by hunting operators in GMAs; g) blurred responsibilities regarding anti-poaching in GMAs resulting in under-investment by all stakeholders. The combined effect of these challenges has been a major reduction in wildlife densities in most PAs and the loss of habitat in GMAs. Wildlife fares better in areas with investment from the private and/or NGO sector and where human settlement is absent. There is a need for: elevated government funding for ZAWA; greater international donor investment in protected area management; a shift in the role of ZAWA such that they focus primarily on national parks while facilitating the development of wildlife-based land uses by other stakeholders elsewhere; and new models for the functioning of GMAs based on joint-ventures between communities and the private and/or NGO sector. Such joint-ventures should provide defined communities with ownership of land, user-rights over wildlife and aim to attract long-term private/donor investment. These recommendations are relevant for many of the under-funded PAs occurring in other African countries. en_US
dc.description.librarian am2014 en_US
dc.description.sponsorship The Wildlife Producers Association of Zambia. CJT was funded with a Claude Leon Fellowship. en_US
dc.description.uri http://www.plosone.org en_US
dc.identifier.citation Lindsey PA, Nyirenda VR, Barnes JI, Becker MS, McRobb R, et al. (2014) Underperformance of African Protected Area Networks and the Case for New Conservation Models: Insights from Zambia. PLoS ONE 9(5): e94109. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094109. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1932-6203
dc.identifier.other 10.1371/journal.pone.0094109
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/41346
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Public Library of Science en_US
dc.rights © 2014 Lindsey et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. en_US
dc.subject Performance en_US
dc.subject Zambia en_US
dc.subject Underperformance en_US
dc.subject Game management area (GMA) en_US
dc.subject African protected area (PA) en_US
dc.subject Conservation en_US
dc.title Underperformance of African protected area networks and the case for new conservation models : insights from Zambia en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record