Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Speciality training in oral and maxillofacial
pathology (OMFP) across the world would be aided
by guidance on a generic curriculum and training
programme that all countries could use as a template.
In order to facilitate this, we require an understanding of
the various forms which OMFP training takes across the
world.
METHODS: We sent a questionnaire to OMF pathologists
in the 42 countries represented in the IAOP
membership, via their Regional Councillor. The questionnaire
included detailed demographics, entry requirements,
specialty training program and facilities/
resources.
RESULTS: Replies were received from 22/42 countries
(52%). OMFP is a dental/dental and medical speciality in
72%, and in 92% of those, this is recognised by a licensing
board. Training was undertaken in an academic environment
in 85% (with many offering a further academic
qualification) and the median length of training was
4 years. General/anatomical pathology training is mandated
in 85% of programs and a common core of general
sub-specialities was identified. An end of training assessment
was conducted in 80% of programs with most
including written, practical and oral elements. Training
program directors and educational supervisors were in
place in 12/16 programs and, in most, Quality Assurance
of training was externally monitored. In only one country
was the number of trainees linked to workforce planning.
CONCLUSIONS: Training in OMFP varies across the
world. However, we feel there is sufficient commonality
for the development of an agreed indicative framework
on education and training in Oral and Maxillofacial
Pathology, perhaps under the auspices of the IAOP.
