The oral application of the Onderstepoort biological products fowl typhoid vaccine, its safety, efficacy and duration of protection in commercial laying hens

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Picard, J.A. en
dc.contributor.advisor Bisschop, Shahn P.R. en
dc.contributor.postgraduate Purchase, Cromwell en
dc.date.accessioned 2013-09-07T10:56:17Z
dc.date.available 2008-08-12 en
dc.date.available 2013-09-07T10:56:17Z
dc.date.created 2006-11-24 en
dc.date.issued 2008-08-12 en
dc.date.submitted 2008-08-12 en
dc.description Dissertation (MSc (Veterinary Science))--University of Pretoria, 2006. en
dc.description.abstract This project was undertaken to establish whether the Onderstepoort Biological Products Fowl Typhoid (OBPft) vaccine registered as an injectable vaccine was effective and safe when administered orally to commercial layers. Its efficacy and duration of protection were compared to the intramuscular injectable route. Commercial brown layer hens were used as they were found to be highly susceptible to Salmonella gallinarum infections. In the safety trial birds were euthanased at timed intervals spanning 4-weeks post vaccination. Necropsies were performed and samples were taken and tested. No clinical signs or mortalities could be attributed to the OBPft vaccine. No active shedding of the vaccine strain could be detected. Slight pathological changes were noted with both routes of vaccination; however these changes were transient, returning to normal within the observation period. The injected group showed a better serological response with the serum agglutination test than the orally vaccinated groups. In the duration of protection trial the two routes of vaccination were compared, the birds were challenged at three 8-week intervals post vaccination. All the unvaccinated birds died. The protection offered to the vaccinated groups was good when birds were challenged 8 and 16-weeks after vaccination. However, this dipped steeply by the challenge 24-weeks post vaccination. Statistically (ANOVA, p<0.05) it was found that there was no significant difference between the protection offered by either the oral or injected route of vaccination with the OBPft vaccine. en
dc.description.availability unrestricted en
dc.description.department Production Animal Studies en
dc.identifier.citation a 2006 E504 en
dc.identifier.other /ag en
dc.identifier.upetdurl http://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/available/etd-08122008-102632/ en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/27188
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher University of Pretoria en_ZA
dc.rights © University of Pretoria 2006 E504 / en
dc.subject Serum agglutination test en
dc.subject Euthanased at timed intervals en
dc.subject Orally vaccinated groups en
dc.subject Salmonella gallinarum infections en
dc.subject UCTD en_US
dc.title The oral application of the Onderstepoort biological products fowl typhoid vaccine, its safety, efficacy and duration of protection in commercial laying hens en
dc.type Dissertation en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record