Reflections on post-apartheid being and becoming in the aftermath of amnesty : Du Toit v Minister of Safety and Security

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Van Marle, Karin
dc.date.accessioned 2011-10-06T11:05:28Z
dc.date.available 2011-10-06T11:05:28Z
dc.date.issued 2010
dc.description.abstract In this note I discuss the case of Du Toit v Minister of Safety and Security (Du Toit). Also, although my main focus will fall on Du Toit, I refer to the recent defamation case of Robert McBride briefly. Both these cases disclose a few of the many complexities of the 'intersection' between an apartheid past and a future that is post-apartheid, particularly post-apartheid being or rather becoming. Beyond illuminating the wider questions of post-apartheid being, becoming and subjectivity, these cases also contribute to something more specific, namely the becoming of a post-apartheid jurisprudence. en
dc.description.uri http://www.pulp.up.ac.za/cat_2009_04.html en_US
dc.identifier.citation Van Marle, K 2010, 'Reflections on post-apartheid being and becoming in the aftermath of amnesty : Du Toit v Minister of Safety and Security', Constitutional Court Review, vol. 3, pp. 347-367. en
dc.identifier.issn 2073-6215
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/17406
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Pretoria University Law Press en_US
dc.rights © 2010 PULP (Pretoria University Law Press) All rights reserved. en
dc.subject Du Toit v Minister of Safety and Security en
dc.subject.lcsh Post-apartheid era -- South Africa en
dc.subject.lcsh Amnesty -- South Africa en
dc.subject.lcsh Jurisprudence -- South Africa en
dc.subject.lcsh Apartheid -- South Africa en
dc.title Reflections on post-apartheid being and becoming in the aftermath of amnesty : Du Toit v Minister of Safety and Security en
dc.type Article en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record