The diagnostic accuracy of endovaginal and transperineal ultrasound for detecting anal sphincter defects : the PREDICT study

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Roos, A-M.
dc.contributor.author Abdool, Zeelha
dc.contributor.author Sultan, Abdul H.
dc.contributor.author Thakar, Ranee
dc.date.accessioned 2011-04-01T06:16:41Z
dc.date.available 2011-04-01T06:16:41Z
dc.date.issued 2011
dc.description.abstract AIM: To determine the accuracy and predictive value of transperineal (TPU) and endovaginal ultrasound (EVU) in the detection of anal sphincter defects in women with obstetric anal sphincter injuries and/or postpartum symptoms of faecal incontinence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and sixty-five women were recruited, four women were excluded as they were seen years after their last delivery. TPU and EVU, followed by endonanal ultrasound (EAU), were performed using the B&K Viking 2400 scanner. Sensitivity and specificity, as well as predictive values with 95% confidence intervals, for detecting anal sphincter defects were calculated for EVU and TPU, using EAU as the reference standard. RESULTS: On EAU a defect was found in 42 (26%) women: 39 (93%) had an external (EAS) and 23 (55%) an internal anal sphincter (IAS) defect. Analysable images of one level of the EAS combined with an analysable IAS were available in 140 (87%) women for EVU and in 131 (81%) for TPU. The sensitivity and specificity for the detection of any defect was 48% (30e67%) and 85% (77e91%) for EVU and 64% (44e81%) and 85% (77e91%) for TPU, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although EAU using a rotating endoprobe is the validated reference standard in the identification of anal sphincter defects, it is not universally available. However while TPU and/or EVU with conventional ultrasound probes can be useful in identifying normality, for clinical purposes they are not sensitive enough to identify an underlying sphincter defect. en
dc.description.sponsorship A.-M. R. was funded by the Mayday Childbirth Charity Fund. Z.A. was provided with a research grant by the International Urogynecological Association in 2009. en
dc.identifier.citation Roos A-M, et al., The diagnostic accuracy of endovaginal and transperineal ultrasound for detecting anal sphincter defects : the PREDICT study, Clinical Radiology (2011), doi:10.1016/j.crad.2010.11.017 en
dc.identifier.issn 0009-9260 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 1365-229X (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.1016/j.crad.2010.11.017
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/16170
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher Elsevier en
dc.rights © 2011 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. en
dc.subject Endovaginal en
dc.subject Transperineal ultrasound en
dc.subject Anal sphincter en
dc.subject.lcsh Diagnostic ultrasonic imaging
dc.subject.lcsh Anus -- Diseases
dc.subject.lcsh Rectum -- Prolapse
dc.subject.lcsh Rotational motion
dc.title The diagnostic accuracy of endovaginal and transperineal ultrasound for detecting anal sphincter defects : the PREDICT study en
dc.type Postprint Article en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record