dc.contributor.author |
Smit, P.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Van Eck, B.P.S. (Stefan)
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2010-09-09T08:52:29Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2010-09-09T08:52:29Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2010 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
The right not to be unfairly dismissed is well-recognised in South African labour law. Anecdotal evidence suggests that South Africa may be overregulated in this regard. ILO Convention C158 provides standard-setting guidelines in respect of the termination of any worker’s employment. In this contribution, ILO standards are considered and the respective positions in the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, the United States of America and South Africa are compared to ILO Convention C158. The authors seek to establish whether unfair dismissal law in South Africa is out of step with international standards and the position in a selection of foreign jurisdictions. |
en_US |
dc.identifier.citation |
Smit, P & Van Eck, BPS 2010 , 'International perspectives on South Africa’s unfair dismissal law', Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 46-67. |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
0010-4051 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/14817 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Institute for Foreign and Comparative Law, UNISA |
en_US |
dc.rights |
Institute for Foreign and Comparative Law, UNISA |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Dismissal law |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Labour law |
en_US |
dc.title |
International perspectives on South Africa’s unfair dismissal law |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |