Sweet potato viruses in South Africa and the effect of viral infection on storage root yield

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Domola, M.J.
dc.contributor.author Thompson, G.J.
dc.contributor.author Aveling, T.A.S. (Terry)
dc.contributor.author Laurie, S.M.
dc.contributor.author Strydom, H.
dc.contributor.author Van den Berg, A.A.
dc.date.accessioned 2009-05-27T07:25:22Z
dc.date.available 2009-05-27T07:25:22Z
dc.date.issued 2008
dc.description.abstract A survey was conducted during 2001–2003 of sweet potato grown by small-scale farmers in the seven main sweet potato-producing provinces of South Africa to determine the incidence of viral diseases in the field. Based on symptoms observed, disease incidence was relatively low. The highest levels of infection observed were between 9–10 % in the Western Cape and Mpumalanga. Symptoms were less prevalent or absent in the Eastern Cape, Limpopo, Gauteng, KwaZulu-Natal and North West. However, grafting onto Ipomoea setosa and subsequent testing by ELISA indicated that 81%of the sampleswere infected by viruses.Nine viruseswere dentified.Sweet potato feathery mottle virus (SPFMV) was the most common and occurred in 73 % of the samples tested.Sweet potato mild mottle ipomovirus (SPMMV) and Sweet potato latent potyvirus (SPLV) were detected in 3 % and 5 % of the samples, respectively. Five viruseswere found for the first time in South Africa, viz.Sweet potato chlorotic fleck virus (SPCFV), Sweet potato mild speckling virus (SPMSV), Sweet potato chlorotic stunt crinivirus (SPCSV-East and West African strains),Sweet potato virus Y (SPVY) andSweet potato virusG (SPVG).The effect of viral infection on storage root yield of ten sweet potato varieties was also studied over two seasons. Total yield was on average reduced by between 12 and 22 %, and marketable yield by 21 to 38 %. Reduction in marketable yield was mainly due to increased cracking of the storage roots. The new Agricultural Research Council varieties Monate and Ndou, and the 1994-5-1 breeding line produced marketable yields of 34–48 tonnes ha–1 even when infected with viruses, whereas the established South African varieties Mafutha and Natal Red yielded only 4–16 tonnes ha–1. en_US
dc.identifier.citation Domola, MJ, Thompson, GJ, Aveling, TAS, Laurie, SM, Strydom, H & Van Den Berg, AA 2008, ‘Sweet potato viruses in South Africa and the effect of viral infection on storage root yield,’ African Plant Protection, vol. 14, pp, 1-9. [http://www.journals.co.za/ej/ejour_plantpro.html OR http://journals.sabinet.co.za/app/] en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1023-3121
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/10185
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Agricultural Research Council en_US
dc.rights Agricultural Research Council en_US
dc.subject Crop reduced yield en_US
dc.subject SPCSV en_US
dc.subject SPFMV en_US
dc.subject SPMMV en_US
dc.subject SPVG en_US
dc.subject SPVY en_US
dc.subject Sweet potato viruses en_US
dc.subject Plant virus indections en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Sweet potatoes -- Diseases and pests -- South Africa en_US
dc.title Sweet potato viruses in South Africa and the effect of viral infection on storage root yield en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record